I Have My Family Tree Back to Adam and Eve

 

I can't resist posting this. We've all heard from well-meaning people who actually believed they could trace their lineage to Adam and Eve !!! (Ever heard of the flood ???)  Don't take my word for it. 

Here is the word from some scholars who have examined the various claimed trees. Thanks to Dick Eastman and his column at https://blog.eogn.com/2020/07/01/i-have-my-family-tree-back-to-adam-and-eve/

Dick Eastman · July 1, 2020 · Genealogy Basics ·

This is another bit of fiction that needs to be wiped out. I have often heard people (I won’t call them “genealogists”) at various times make the claim that they have traced their family tree back to Adam and Eve. Of course, the “documentation” is always sketchy.

Robert C. Gunderson was a Senior Royalty Research Specialist of the Church Genealogical Department at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Mormons). He was an expert in medieval genealogy and started the Royalty Identification Unit in 1972. He passed away in 2003. However, before his death, Gunderson was once asked if such research was

“The simplest answer is No. Let me explain. In thirty-five years of genealogical research, I have yet to see a pedigree back to Adam that can be documented. By assignment, I have reviewed hundreds of pedigrees over the years. I have not found one where each connection on the pedigree can be justified by evidence from contemporary documents. In my opinion it is not even possible to verify a connected European pedigree historically earlier than the time of the Merovingian Kings (c. a.d. 450–a.d. 752).

“

Every pedigree I have seen that attempts to bridge the gap between that time and the biblical pedigree appears to be based on questionable tradition, or at worst, plain fabrication. Generally these pedigrees offer no evidence as to the origin of the information, or they cite a vague source.”

François Weil, a former director of studies (professor) at the École des Hautes Etudes en sciences sociales (EHESS) in Paris and currently a State Councilor, is another expert in medieval pedigrees who agrees. Weil provides authoritative answers to these questions in his book Family Trees: A History of Genealogy in America (2013) published by Harvard University Press.

Both Gunderson and Weil agreed: European royal pedigrees cannot be verified before the 500s A.D.

To learn more, read:

Family Trees: A History of Genealogy in America. By François Weil. Published by Harvard University Press, Online bookstore, 2013. ISBN 9780674045835. 320 pp. Indexes. Hardcover. $27.95. http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674045835 or available on Amazon as a hardcover book at https://amzn.to/2BloHUu.

The Genealogy Fingerprint

 

What Fingerprints Can Tell Us

Genealogy Research Tip:

One of the cornerstones for laying a good foundation in any family history research is the birth event. It is one of the most important life events that we should research in documenting anyone's life.

For instance, what makes you unique is that you are born on a definitive month, day, and year; at a specific geographic location; given a birth name by your parents; and are the child of a set of specific biological parents.

Do you know anyone else in the world who has your date of birth and birth location, and the same full name? Of course, you don't. In order to extend a person into a previous generation (i.e., parents) we need to get the birth event information right. I call this the "genealogy fingerprint. "

When researching your family, if you lock any part of or all that information in, that will then help you sort out your John Smith from the rest of the John Smiths in a specific community.

Another consideration that I just thought about for the birth life event is that a child born at a specific location means the mother was also at that location at the time of the birth. But it does not necessarily mean that the father was there at that same time. You cannot assume that the father was present at the birth or even in the same town. In fact, you also cannot assume the father was even alive at the time of the birth.

The Day the Old Photograph Spoke

 

String Prairie, Texas 

There are moments in genealogy when the past suddenly stops being distant.

Most family historians have experienced it at least once. You are carefully sorting through an old box of photographs, perhaps one that has sat untouched in a closet, attic, or dresser drawer for decades. The images are faded. Some are bent at the corners. A few names may be written on the back in nearly invisible pencil. Others have no identification at all.

Then suddenly, one photograph seems to “speak.”

Not literally, of course. But something about the image reaches across time and captures your attention in a way the others do not.

Perhaps it is the expression on someone’s face.

Maybe it is the resemblance to a living family member.

Or perhaps it is a tiny detail hidden in the background that tells an unexpected story.

That moment is one of the true joys of genealogy.

For years, many people think of genealogy as simply collecting names, dates, and places. Census records, birth certificates, marriage licenses, and obituaries are all important pieces of the puzzle. But photographs bring something entirely different to family history research. They bring emotion. They bring personality. They remind us that our ancestors were real people who laughed, worried, worked, struggled, and hoped—just as we do today.

An old photograph can reveal far more than we first realize.

A studio portrait may show the style of clothing worn during a particular decade. A military uniform might identify wartime service. A store sign in the background could reveal where a family once lived. Even hairstyles, jewelry, automobiles, or furniture can help date a photograph and place it into historical context.

Sometimes the smallest details become the biggest clues.

I have often found myself studying old family photographs far longer than I intended. What first appeared to be an ordinary image slowly began to reveal details I had never noticed before. A familiar family resemblance suddenly becomes obvious. A handwritten note on the back provides a forgotten location. An unknown child standing quietly beside an adult may later become identified through additional research.

And occasionally, an old photograph can stir powerful emotions.

You may find yourself staring into the eyes of a great-grandparent you never met, wondering what kind of life they lived. What were their dreams? What hardships did they endure? Did they realize that generations later, someone would still treasure their image and wonder about their story?

That is when the photograph truly “speaks.”

It reminds us that genealogy is not simply about building a family tree. It is about reconnecting with human lives that time might otherwise forget.

In today’s digital world, preserving old family photographs has become more important than ever. Many aging photographs are fading, cracking, or deteriorating. Some exist only in a single fragile copy. Scanning and preserving these images ensures that future generations will still be able to see the faces of those who came before them.

But beyond preservation, we should also share the stories connected to those photographs.

First,  use a label to write the names of the people, and a place if you know it, as well as the year taken.  Don't actually write on the back of an old photograpgh - which can leave marks on the front image. Record memories while older relatives are still living. Ask questions. Identify locations. Preserve family traditions connected to the people in the images. A photograph without a story is still valuable—but a photograph with a story becomes priceless.

And sometimes, if we look carefully enough, an old photograph may still have something left to say.